Joseph Magly
b192577b54
Capture the brownfield architecture and its relationship to the project vision.\n\n- add the current-state SAD and five retrospective ADRs\n- classify vision vectors against implementation evidence\n- record requirements, risks, gates, and construction handoff
25 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
25 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Iteration 001 Plan — Architecture Alignment
|
||
|
||
**Sprint goal:** Make current-state architecture and vision alignment maintainable, testable governance assets.
|
||
|
||
## Planned Work
|
||
|
||
1. Review and accept/amend SAD and ADR-001–005 with maintainers.
|
||
2. Reconcile canonical repository identity in package metadata and tracker configuration.
|
||
3. Add a documentation audit that detects stable/experimental/roadmap conflicts across README, FEATURES, SAD, and vision alignment.
|
||
4. Map each network-capable arsenal adapter to scope/approval tests.
|
||
5. Establish performance baselines for source ingestion and concurrent mission tasks.
|
||
6. Triage the 18 TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX markers identified during intake.
|
||
|
||
## Definition of Done
|
||
|
||
- Maintainer decisions are reflected in accepted/superseded ADR status.
|
||
- CI or a documented release check validates maturity claim consistency.
|
||
- Safety-test coverage matrix has no unidentified network adapter.
|
||
- Baseline measurements include command, corpus, environment, and receipt.
|
||
- No roadmap capability is presented as current stable architecture.
|
||
|
||
## Dependencies and Risks
|
||
|
||
Owner validation is needed for repository identity and roadmap priority. Architecture documentation changes are non-runtime, but any resulting safety-control change requires the full security and claim gate suite.
|