Joseph Magly
afc9dad1b2
* docs(policy): allow low-impact contributor courtesy cleanup * chore(aiwg): migrate to shared BT6 maintainer plugin * chore: reconcile delivery validation
2.7 KiB
2.7 KiB
Architecture Baseline Milestone Gate Report
Gate Metadata
- Decision: PASS WITH CONDITIONS
- Evaluation date: 2026-07-21
- Scope: Current-state brownfield architecture and construction-readiness evidence
- Evaluator: Artifact standards audit; named maintainer approval pending
Criteria and Evidence
| Criterion | Threshold | Status | Citable evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAD completeness | v3 sections, context/container/component/data/sequences/API/deployment/cross-cutting/technology/traceability/open questions | PASS | Software Architecture Document |
| Architectural decisions | At least three decisions with context, alternatives, consequences, risks, implementation/tests, references | PASS | ADR-001 through ADR-005 |
| Requirement architecture coverage | Every UC, story group, and NFR maps to a component/tactic and verification | PASS | SAD §§12–14 |
| Test strategy | Levels, environments, metrics, risk mapping, and blocking gates are explicit | PASS | Test strategy |
| Risk control | No accepted release path weakens blocking safety controls | PASS | R-001/R-002/R-008; ADR-003 |
| Vision/current-state separation | Maturity evidence and promotion gates are explicit | PASS | ADR-005 and vision alignment |
| Review approval | Named architecture/safety/evaluation approval recorded | CONDITION | Roles defined; named sign-off pending |
| Open architecture work | Gaps have owners/target phase and do not masquerade as implemented claims | PASS | SAD Appendix B; Iteration 001 |
Conditions
- Maintainers must review the SAD/ADRs and record named accept/amend/supersede outcomes.
- Complete the adapter safety inventory and maturity-consistency automation before claiming those controls are complete.
- Establish measured workload/startup/shutdown baselines before making performance or disposability claims.
Decision Rationale
The current-state architecture is sufficiently detailed and traceable for controlled brownfield construction. “Pass” does not promote experimental features, prove hosted-service readiness, or fabricate stakeholder approval. The conditions are explicit construction work and release-review prerequisites where applicable.
References
- @.aiwg/architecture/software-architecture-doc.md — Architecture baseline and matrices.
- @.aiwg/architecture/adr-001.md — Local-first modular structure.
- @.aiwg/architecture/adr-003.md — Deterministic safety boundary.
- @.aiwg/architecture/adr-005.md — Maturity boundary.
- @.aiwg/architecture/vision-alignment.md — Evidence and promotion criteria.
- @.aiwg/testing/test-strategy.md — Verification strategy.
- @.aiwg/planning/iteration-001-plan.md — Condition closure plan.
- @.aiwg/team/team-profile.md — Pending named ownership.