Merge pull request #36 from M3NT8L-One/codex/provenance-docs-20260706
docs: explain verified provenance setup
This commit is contained in:
2 files changed
+65
No files matched your search
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ Deeper reading: [WALL_FORENSICS](docs/WALL_FORENSICS.md) (per-challenge misses),
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| [FEATURES.md](FEATURES.md) | feature-by-feature status (`[x]` shipped / `[~]` partial / `[ ]` planned) |
|
||||
| [SCOPE_AND_AUTHORIZATION](docs/SCOPE_AND_AUTHORIZATION.md) | authority model, scope receipts, evidence and retest rules |
|
||||
| [VERIFIED_PROVENANCE](docs/VERIFIED_PROVENANCE.md) | how findings become tool-proven instead of model-asserted |
|
||||
| [TEAM_PREVIEW](docs/TEAM_PREVIEW.md) | first-run path and review script |
|
||||
| [INSTALL_MATRIX](docs/INSTALL_MATRIX.md) | macOS / Linux readiness table |
|
||||
| [ARSENAL_ACTIVATION_PLAN](docs/ARSENAL_ACTIVATION_PLAN.md) | optional external-tool setup |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
# Verified Provenance
|
||||
|
||||
T3MP3ST is evidence-first: a finding should say whether it is backed by tool
|
||||
output, context, or only model reasoning.
|
||||
|
||||
If the evidence vault says `Provenance: none` or `model-asserted`, the finding is
|
||||
not yet verified. Treat it as a hypothesis until a tool result, retest, or
|
||||
operator-supplied artifact backs the claim.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Counts As Tool-Proven
|
||||
|
||||
A finding becomes tool-proven when all of these are true:
|
||||
|
||||
- The agent requests an Arsenal tool.
|
||||
- T3MP3ST executes that tool through the harness.
|
||||
- The returned output is captured as evidence.
|
||||
- The finding records the tool name or evidence reference that supports it.
|
||||
|
||||
Final prose from a model is useful analysis, but it is not the same thing as
|
||||
tool-backed evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
## Keyless And Local-Agent Runs
|
||||
|
||||
For keyless runs, connect a local agent in the War Room Settings first: Claude
|
||||
Code, Codex, Hermes, or another supported local-agent backend.
|
||||
|
||||
The local agent must request tools through T3MP3ST. If it only writes a final
|
||||
answer in prose, the harness has no tool output to attach and findings should stay
|
||||
unverified/model-asserted.
|
||||
|
||||
For a quick sanity check:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Start the War Room with `npm run server`.
|
||||
2. Connect a local agent in Settings.
|
||||
3. Use a local or explicitly authorized target.
|
||||
4. Run a harmless reconnaissance path.
|
||||
5. Open the evidence/finding view and check that at least one finding cites a
|
||||
tool name and captured output.
|
||||
|
||||
If every finding remains `Provenance: none`, the run may still be useful as a
|
||||
planning pass, but it did not verify findings through the tool loop.
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Reasons Provenance Is Missing
|
||||
|
||||
- No API provider or local agent is connected.
|
||||
- The chosen agent produced prose instead of a tool request.
|
||||
- The tool request could not be parsed by the local-agent/tool-call bridge.
|
||||
- The tool was catalog-only, missing locally, or receipt-gated.
|
||||
- The target or action was out of scope, so the harness correctly refused it.
|
||||
- The final report promoted model analysis before a retest or evidence item was
|
||||
attached.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operator Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before trusting a finding:
|
||||
|
||||
- Is there an evidence item?
|
||||
- Does the evidence item include tool output, a command result, a screenshot, or
|
||||
another reproducible artifact?
|
||||
- Does the finding cite the evidence or tool name?
|
||||
- Did any receipt or scope gate apply?
|
||||
- Has the claim been retested or falsified?
|
||||
|
||||
When in doubt, keep the finding labeled as unverified and queue a retest.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user