Files
t3mp3st/.aiwg/reports/lom-gate-report.md
T
Joseph Magly afc9dad1b2 chore(aiwg): adopt shared BT6 maintainer workflow (#148)
* docs(policy): allow low-impact contributor courtesy cleanup

* chore(aiwg): migrate to shared BT6 maintainer plugin

* chore: reconcile delivery validation
2026-08-02 17:17:28 -04:00

2.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Lifecycle Objective Milestone Gate Report

Gate Metadata

  • Decision: PASS WITH CONDITIONS
  • Evaluation date: 2026-07-21
  • Scope: Brownfield lifecycle objectives, owner context, initial risk, and solution viability
  • Evaluator: Artifact standards audit; named maintainer approval pending

Criteria and Evidence

Criterion Threshold Status Citable evidence
Problem and outcomes Problem, stakeholders, scope, measurable success criteria PASS Intake form and project intake
Owner intent Priority, scale context, failure posture, commitments recorded PASS Option matrix owner answers and decision record
Initial risk Impact/likelihood/exposure/owner/status/residual risk for critical domains PASS Risk register R-001–R-010
Quality constraints Critical NFRs are measurable with repeatable verification PASS NFR-01–NFR-12 register
Solution viability Implemented brownfield path exists; no infeasible constraint identified PASS Codebase report, SAD, current CI
Ownership Named owners/reviewers assigned CONDITION Roles defined, assignments pending

Conditions and Residual Uncertainty

  1. Assign named architecture, safety, evaluation, test, and release owners before a release/maturity decision relies on role approval.
  2. Treat the thousands-to-tens-of-thousands scale as owner-supplied planning context, not measured telemetry.
  3. Do not infer hosted SLOs, general support commitments, or certification from the current local/open-source baseline.

Decision Rationale

The gate authorizes brownfield elaboration/construction-alignment work because the problem, current solution, success criteria, risks, owner intent, and critical quality constraints are explicit. The ownership condition affects review evidence but does not prevent documenting or testing the implemented baseline.

References

  • @.aiwg/intake/intake-form.md — Concise objective and owner context.
  • @.aiwg/intake/project-intake.md — Detailed brownfield baseline.
  • @.aiwg/intake/option-matrix.md — Owner answers and trade-offs.
  • @.aiwg/intake/risk-screening.md — Prioritized risks.
  • @.aiwg/requirements/nfr-register.md — Measurable constraints.
  • @.aiwg/team/team-profile.md — Pending role assignment.